Metabolon Logo

GUIDE TO THE EXPOSOME

High-Confidence Metabolite Identification Maximizes Exposome Data to Shape Public Health Policy

5.0 Introduction

The last chapter touched on the importance of reliable metabolomics in exposome research. Here, we dive deeper into this topic by exploring the role of metabolite identification in the analysis and interpretation of exposome findings and how it impacts downstream decision-making. Biomonitoring plays a crucial role in understanding how exposure to chemicals, environmental factors, and other substances affect human health. The evidence generated from biomonitoring is often applied to public health policies and regulatory guidelines to avoid harmful exposures and poor health outcomes. Metabolite measurements are part of the evidence that regulators use to justify actions, and the interpretability of these metabolomics data rests on accurate identification of metabolites detected in biological samples. In this chapter we will discuss the levels of metabolite identity and criteria used to define them, as well as key instances where accurate metabolite identification led to policy changes that improved human safety by removing harmful chemicals from consumer products and the water supply.

5.1 Level 1 Metabolite Identification

Accurately identifying metabolites from untargeted profiling experiments is a complex and challenging process. The metabolome is comprised of numerous small molecules that encompass a wide range of chemical structures and ion features, and many of these metabolites exist as isomers, which have identical masses but different structures. Adding further complexity to metabolite identification is the reality that fragmentation spectra are highly specific highly specific to an LC-MS instrument and its parameters.

To promote best chemical analysis practices and maximize interpretability of metabolomics data, the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) has defined 5 levels of metabolite identification according to the available evidence that supports a biochemical’s identity (Figure 5.1).

Figure 5.1: This pyramid illustrates the five confidence levels of metabolite annotation, from basic mass measurement (Level 5) to fully validated identification (Level 1). Each ascending level represents an increase in structural certainty and analytical validation, culminating in Level 1 “Validated identification,” where confirmed structures are matched through orthogonal analytical methods using authentic chemical standards.2,3

5.1.1 Exposure to Bisphenol A

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an industrial chemical used to manufacture polycarbonate plastics such as baby bottles and protective coatings on the inside of food containers. Exposure to BPA is thought to occur mostly from ingesting food stored in BPA-coated containers. From the late 1990s to early 2000s several studies showed that exposure to BPA results in developmental and reproductive alterations in laboratory animals3,4. This raised concern among environmental public health officials and prompted investigation into the concentrations of this compound in the U.S. population and potential impacts of its exposure on health.

In 2008, Calafat et. al. used isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS methods and Level 1 metabolite identification criteria to analyze urine samples from 2,517 participants in the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey5. They showed that BPA, as measured by free BPA and non-estrogenic metabolites of BPA, were detected in 92.6% of study participants. Follow-up epidemiological studies showed that adults with high BPA exposure were more likely to have coronary artery disease, diabetes, immune dysfunction, and liver enzyme abnormalities6-8. Other studies reported association of high BPA levels with neurodivergent behavior in children10 and in utero exposure to BPA with low birth weight10,11. These findings, together with toxicology and risk assessments, led to the 2011 decision by the European Union and China’s Ministry of Health to prohibit the manufacturing of baby bottles containing BPA12,15. In 2012, this same policy change was implemented by the FDA for baby bottles and sippy cups sold in the United States13,15. Since then, other Asian countries including Malaysia, Thailand, South Korea, and the Philippines have outlawed BPA in baby bottles, sippy cups, and infant formula15.

Given that BPA and its non-estrogenic metabolites share structural similarities, including two phenol rings linked by a central carbon bridge, Level 1 identification of those compounds was vital to generating data that could be compared across laboratories, institutions, and studies conducted years apart, to lead to an important policy change that will potentially mitigate harmful effects of BPA exposure on human health.

5.1.2 Exposure to Phthalates

Phthalates (i.e., plasticizers) are phthalic acid esters that impart plastics plastics with durability and flexibility. They are found in food packaging, pharmaceuticals, children’s toys, adhesives, and personal care products. Owing to their prevalence in consumer goods, steady levels of phthalates in the urine of children and adults have been detected since the 1970s16. Once ingested, phthalates are rapidly metabolized through a 2-step process (Figure 5.2). First, they are hydrolyzed into monoester metabolites by esterases and lipases. These monoesters can then be further metabolized through oxidation or conjugated with glucuronic acid, forming hydrophilic compounds that are readily excreted in the urine.

Figure 5.2: Summary of phthalate metabolism. Image adapted from Kim SH et al. Phthalate exposure and childhood obesity. Ann Pediatr Endocinol Metab. 201417

Recent studies have demonstrated a link between childhood exposure of certain phthalates to compromised health. For example, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP) may increase the risk of asthma and eczema17-20. Additionally, prospective studies from 4 different cohorts showed that gestational BBP, DEHP, di-butyl phthalate (DBP), and di-ethyl phthalate (DEP) exposures are associated with delays in the physical development of infants and toddlers21,22 as well as parent-reported neurodivergent behavior9,23.

In each of those studies, phthalates and their metabolic products were measured using validated targeted methods with isotope-dilution and reference materials to thereby achieve the criteria for Level 1 metabolite identification. High confidence in the biochemical species that were linked to concerning health outcomes, and the ability to compare data generated on different MS platforms in different laboratories, enabled a substantial amount of evidence on the harmful effects of those phthalates to be brought before regulatory authorities.

That evidence ultimately led to the European Union, the United States, and China limiting the concentrations of DEHP, DBP, and BBP to 0.1% by weight in children’s toys and childcare products24-26. Overall, this example demonstrates how high-confidence metabolite identification is part of the bedrock of rigorous and impactful exposome research.

5.1.3 Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of fluorinated chemicals widely used in industrial and commercial products including kitchenware, food packaging, clothing, and carpeting. They have been detected in the serum of several populations globally27,28, and epidemiological studies have associated overexposure to PFAS with immunological health conditions30, compromised fetal growth and development30, and cancers31,32 (Figure 5.3).

Figure 5.3: Detection of PFAS in drinking water (left), and annual average cancer incidence rate per 100,000 between 2016 and 2021 for cancers in the respiratory and endocrine systems (middle and right). Image has been adapted and modified from Li et al. Associations between per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and county-level cancer incidence between 2016 and 2021 and incidence cancer burden attributable to PFAS in drinking water in the United States. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 202533

These clinical observations inspired significant efforts to understand how PFAS could drive the onset of those diseases. Many subsequent studies utilized validated LC-MS methods and biochemical standards for untargeted metabolic profiling. These studies showed that urea cycle/amino acid metabolism is affected by PFAS exposure, which has implications on insulin resistance and diabetes-related heart failure in older adults. Carnitines/acylcarnitines were also impacted by PFAS, showing impaired fatty acid oxidation and accumulation of lipids in tissue, which are major drivers of obesity and insulin resistance. Glycerophospholipid metabolism was another top-hit pathway associated with PFAS exposure, which has been previously linked to cardiovascular disease progression.

These studies, which identified the same PFAS-induced metabolic perturbations that could be linked to various diseases, along with biomonitoring and other mechanistic data, were influential in the recent wave of changes to national drinking water standards for certain PFAS. These new standards limit the amounts of the PFAS compounds PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, and HFOP-DA to 4 parts per trillion each. This example demonstrates the utility of untargeted metabolomics in characterizing cause-and-effect relationships between the exposome and health, and the value of accurate metabolite identification to biological interpretability and meaningful results.

As we mentioned earlier in this chapter, identifying exposome metabolites from untargeted profiling experiments is extremely challenging, and having robust analytical capabilities is essential to generating meaningful data. We note that Metabolon’s Global Discovery (i.e., untargeted) Platform has been validated against an independent targeted assay at Uppsala University45, and demonstrated strong concordance in PFAS metabolite measurements, underscoring the platform’s analytical robustness. Such MSI Level 1 identifications provide the rigor and reliability necessary to support evidence-based policymaking for environmental exposures.

5.2 Conclusions and Metabolon’s Advantages

Level 1 metabolite identification is vital to generating rigorous and impactful findings that drive scientific discovery, and guide decision making for both public and individually based health concerns.

In untargeted metabolomics, a single MS1 peak can match multiple compounds in public databases because many metabolites share the same mass, and fragments can overlap between structurally related molecules. Most metabolomics providers report any potential database matches, which inflate their coverage numbers while leaving the investigator with a dataset containing ambiguous IDs, which undermines proper data interpretation. Furthermore, many providers do not distinguish which metabolites in a dataset were identified with Level 1 confidence from those identified with lower confidence.

Metabolon uses authentic biochemical standards, retention time confirmation, and biological plausibility filters to ensure each peak is assigned a single confident identification instead of multiple possible (i.e., ambiguous) annotations. Metabolon obtains evidence to support the identity of each metabolite, ranging from a biochemical standard (Level 1) to only molecular mass (Level 5), enabling accurate interpretation of the data and generation of robust hypotheses. Metabolon also has the largest library of Level 1 identified metabolites in the world, delivering industry-leading breadth and depth of metabolite coverage.

Metabolon’s library, coupled with our robust methods of annotation, gives our customers a decisive advantage over competitor metabolomics providers and arms them with the appropriate evidence to guide policy.

K
L
References

1. Members MSIB, Sansone SA, Fan T, et al. The metabolomics standards initiative. Nat Biotechnol. Aug 2007;25(8):846-8. doi:10.1038/nbt0807-846b
2. Durando M, Kass L, Piva J, et al. Prenatal bisphenol A exposure induces preneoplastic lesions in the mammary gland in Wistar rats. Environ Health Perspect. Jan 2007;115(1):80-6. doi:10.1289/ehp.9282
3. Richter CA, Birnbaum LS, Farabollini F, et al. In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies. Reprod Toxicol. Aug-Sep 2007;24(2):199-224. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.06.004
4. Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect. Jan 2008;116(1):39-44. doi:10.1289/ehp.10753
5. Clayton EM, Todd M, Dowd JB, Aiello AE. The impact of bisphenol A and triclosan on immune parameters in the U.S. population, NHANES 2003-2006. Environ Health Perspect. Mar 2011;119(3):390-6. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002883
6. Lang IA, Galloway TS, Scarlett A, et al. Association of urinary bisphenol A concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. JAMA. Sep 17 2008;300(11):1303-10. doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1303
7. Melzer D, Rice NE, Lewis C, Henley WE, Galloway TS. Association of urinary bisphenol a concentration with heart disease: evidence from NHANES 2003/06. PLoS One. Jan 13 2010;5(1):e8673. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008673
8. Miodovnik A, Engel SM, Zhu C, et al. Endocrine disruptors and childhood social impairment. Neurotoxicology. Mar 2011;32(2):261-7. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2010.12.009
9. Miao M, Yuan W, Zhu G, He X, Li DK. In utero exposure to bisphenol-A and its effect on birth weight of offspring. Reprod Toxicol. Jul 2011;32(1):64-8. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.03.002
10. Calafat AM, Weuve J, Ye X, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A and other phenols in neonatal intensive care unit premature infants. Environ Health Perspect. Apr 2009;117(4):639-44. doi:10.1289/ehp.0800265
11. Bisphenol A: EU ban on use in baby bottles enters into force next week. 2011. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_11_229
12. China Bans BPA in Infant Feeding Bottles. 2011. https://newsletter.sgs.com/eNewsletterPro/uploadedimages/000006/SGS-Safeguards-10311-China-bans-BPA-in-infant-feeding-bottles-A4-EN-11.pdf
13. Register F. Indirect Food Additives: Polymers. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/07/17/2012-17366/indirect-food-additives-polymers
14. EcoWaste Coalition Press Release: Philippines Bans Toxic Bisphenol A (BPA) in Plastic Baby Feeding Bottles and Sippy Cups. 2019. https://ipen.org/news/ecowaste-coalition-press-release-philippines-bans-toxic-bisphenol-bpa-plastic-baby-feeding#:~:text=Through%20the%20issuance%20of%20FDA,the%2028%2Dcountry%20European%20Union.
15. Prevention CfDCa. Biomonitoring: Phthalates. 2018. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-08/biomonitoring-methods_phthalates.2023.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
16. Just AC, Whyatt RM, Miller RL, et al. Children's urinary phthalate metabolites and fractional exhaled nitric oxide in an urban cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Nov 1 2012;186(9):830-7. doi:10.1164/rccm.201203-0398OC
17. Hsu NY, Lee CC, Wang JY, et al. Predicted risk of childhood allergy, asthma, and reported symptoms using measured phthalate exposure in dust and urine. Indoor Air. Jun 2012;22(3):186-99. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00753.x
18. Bornehag CG, Sundell J, Weschler CJ, et al. The association between asthma and allergic symptoms in children and phthalates in house dust: a nested case-control study. Environ Health Perspect. Oct 2004;112(14):1393-7. doi:10.1289/ehp.7187
19. Kolarik B, Naydenov K, Larsson M, Bornehag CG, Sundell J. The association between phthalates in dust and allergic diseases among Bulgarian children. Environ Health Perspect. Jan 2008;116(1):98-103. doi:10.1289/ehp.10498
20. Kim Y, Ha EH, Kim EJ, et al. Prenatal exposure to phthalates and infant development at 6 months: prospective Mothers and Children's Environmental Health (MOCEH) study. Environ Health Perspect. Oct 2011;119(10):1495-500. doi:10.1289/ehp.1003178
21. Whyatt RM, Liu X, Rauh VA, et al. Maternal prenatal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and child mental, psychomotor, and behavioral development at 3 years of age. Environ Health Perspect. Feb 2012;120(2):290-5. doi:10.1289/ehp.1103705
22. Engel SM, Miodovnik A, Canfield RL, et al. Prenatal phthalate exposure is associated with childhood behavior and executive functioning. Environ Health Perspect. Apr 2010;118(4):565-71. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901470
23. Commission USCPS. CPSC Prohibits Certain Phthalates in Children's Toys and Child Care Products. https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2018/CPSC-Prohibits-Certain-Phthalates-in-Childrens-Toys-and-Child-Care-Products?utm_source=chatgpt.com
24. Union OJotE. Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2005 of 17 December 2018. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/2005/oj/eng
25. Four New Phthalate Restrictions Added to China. 2024. https://www.cirs-group.com/en/chemicals/china-rohs-adds-four-new-phthalate-restrictions
26. Bjerregaard-Olesen C, Bach CC, Long M, et al. Time trends of perfluorinated alkyl acids in serum from Danish pregnant women 2008-2013. Environ Int. May 2016;91:14-21. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.010
27. Calafat AM, Kato K, Hubbard K, Jia T, Botelho JC, Wong LY. Legacy and alternative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the U.S. general population: Paired serum-urine data from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ Int. Oct 2019;131:105048. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105048
28. Chang ET, Adami HO, Boffetta P, Wedner HJ, Mandel JS. A critical review of perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctanesulfonate exposure and immunological health conditions in humans. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2016;46(4):279-331. doi:10.3109/10408444.2015.1122573
29. Liew Z, Goudarzi H, Oulhote Y. Developmental Exposures to Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): An Update of Associated Health Outcomes. Curr Environ Health Rep. Mar 2018;5(1):1-19. doi:10.1007/s40572-018-0173-4
30. Bartell SM, Vieira VM. Critical review on PFOA, kidney cancer, and testicular cancer. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. Jun 2021;71(6):663-679. doi:10.1080/10962247.2021.1909668
31. Steenland K, Winquist A. PFAS and cancer, a scoping review of the epidemiologic evidence. Environ Res. Mar 2021;194:110690. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110690
32. Alderete TL, Jin R, Walker DI, et al. Perfluoroalkyl substances, metabolomic profiling, and alterations in glucose homeostasis among overweight and obese Hispanic children: A proof-of-concept analysis. Environ Int. May 2019;126:445-453. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.047
33. Hu X, Li S, Cirillo PM, et al. Metabolome Wide Association Study of Serum Poly and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Pregnancy and Early Postpartum. Reprod Toxicol. Aug 2019;87:70-78. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.05.058
34. Jin R, McConnell R, Catherine C, et al. Perfluoroalkyl substances and severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver in Children: An untargeted metabolomics approach. Environ Int. Jan 2020;134:105220. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105220
35. Cao YF, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Plasma Levels of Amino Acids Related to Urea Cycle and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Adults. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:50. doi:10.3389/fendo.2019.00050
36. Li LO, Hu YF, Wang L, Mitchell M, Berger A, Coleman RA. Early hepatic insulin resistance in mice: a metabolomics analysis. Mol Endocrinol. Mar 2010;24(3):657-66. doi:10.1210/me.2009-0152
37. Kovalik JP, Zhao X, Gao F, et al. Amino acid differences between diabetic older adults and non-diabetic older adults and their associations with cardiovascular function. J Mol Cell Cardiol. Sep 2021;158:63-71. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2021.05.009
38. Chen Z, Yang T, Walker DI, et al. Dysregulated lipid and fatty acid metabolism link perfluoroalkyl substances exposure and impaired glucose metabolism in young adults. Environ Int. Dec 2020;145:106091. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.106091
39. Kingsley SL, Walker DI, Calafat AM, et al. Metabolomics of childhood exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances: a cross-sectional study. Metabolomics. Jun 21 2019;15(7):95. doi:10.1007/s11306-019-1560-z
40. Bene J, Hadzsiev K, Melegh B. Role of carnitine and its derivatives in the development and management of type 2 diabetes. Nutr Diabetes. Mar 7 2018;8(1):8. doi:10.1038/s41387-018-0017-1
41. Salihovic S, Fall T, Ganna A, et al. Identification of metabolic profiles associated with human exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. Mar 2019;29(2):196-205. doi:10.1038/s41370-018-0060-y
42. Chen H, Wang Z, Qin M, et al. Comprehensive Metabolomics Identified the Prominent Role of Glycerophospholipid Metabolism in Coronary Artery Disease Progression. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:632950. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.632950
43. Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes First-Ever National Drinking Water Standard to Protect 100M People from PFAS Pollution. 2024. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/biden-harris-administration-finalizes-first-ever-national-drinking-water-standard
44. Salihovic S, Dunder L, Lind M, Lind L. Assessing the performance of a targeted absolute quantification isotope dilution liquid chromatograhy tandem mass spectrometry assay versus a commercial nontargeted relative quantification assay for detection of three major perfluoroalkyls in human blood. J Mass Spectrom. Feb 2024;59(2):e4999. doi:10.1002/jms.4999

great place to work logo

Download the Guide as a PDF

Explore the complexity and associated challenges of studying the exposome by downloading our complete Guide to the Exposome, which provides a comprehensive examination of the state of exposome research and how metabolomics can help generate meaningful insights in this field.

GET STARTED

Talk with an expert

Request a quote, get detailed information on sample types, or learn how metabolomics can accelerate your research. Find our contact details are here.

Find us on:

Talk with a Metabolomics expert