Blog

Evaluating Biologics-induced Liver Injury Using Metabolomics and Computational Modeling

Evaluating Biologics-induced Liver Injury Using Metabolomics and Computational Modeling

Biologics, which include vaccines, gene therapies, and recombinant therapeutic proteins, are a type of drug derived from biological sources. Although highly valuable, their use comes with a significant challenge—the potential for liver injury. For example, the clinical development of cimaglermin alfa (GGF2), which was intended for heart failure therapy, was terminated due to elevated biomarkers indicating liver injury and dysfunction. Other drugs, such as tocilizumab, require liver testing before and during treatment.

Challenges in Testing Biologic-induced Liver Injury (BILI)

Evaluating biologics-induced liver injury during development is challenging because biologics are specific towards human targets. Therefore, these drugs may have limited cross-reactivity in other species, making traditional animal models less effective. Scientists have developed various methods to study biologics-induced liver injury to overcome these challenges.

Methods for Studying Biologics-induced Liver Injury

Metabolomics and Its Role in Biologics Safety Assessment

Metabolomics is a cutting-edge analytical technique that involves the comprehensive profiling of small molecules (metabolites) present in biological samples, such as blood or urine. By characterizing these metabolites, researchers can gain insight into the metabolic changes and the toxicity mechanisms induced by biologics and their impact on the liver. When accessed during preclinical and clinical studies, these biomarkers can serve as early indicators of hepatotoxicity, helping identify potential safety concerns during drug development.

Liver-on-a-chip Models Recapitulate Liver Structure and Function

Liver-on-a-chip models have emerged as a groundbreaking technology that bridges the gap between cell culture and animal studies. These microphysiological systems are engineered to mimic the intricate structure and function of the human liver, enabling researchers to study drug metabolism and toxicity in a more physiologically relevant environment. For example, the Liver Acinus Microphysiology System (LAMPS) recapitulates the liver acinus structure functioning and can be used to evaluate liver responses to drugs.

Computational Modeling for Hepatotoxicity Prediction

Computational algorithms, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, can integrate diverse data sources, including metabolomic data, genetic information, and clinical parameters, to create predictive models of drug-induced liver injury. Such models include quantitative systems toxicology (QST) platforms that simulate the effects of small molecules (DILIsym®) and the effects of biologics (BIOLOGXsym™) on the liver. The BIOLOGXsym™ platform focuses on macromolecules and represents pathways specifically used with biologics.

By using these models, researchers can assess the potential hepatotoxicity of a biologics before proceeding to expensive and time-consuming clinical trials. This not only saves resources but also enhances patient safety by identifying high-risk candidates early in the drug development process.

A Three-Pronged Approach to Studying Biologics-induced Liver Injury

In a recent study,1 we applied metabolomics, liver-on-a-chip, and computational modeling to evaluate the effects of biologics on the liver. Metabolon’s Global Discovery Panel was used to perform metabolomic analysis from the liver-on-a-chip model after treatment with tocilizumab revealed signatures of increased hepatocyte steatosis, oxidative stress, and tissue remodeling. We then leveraged this metabolomics data and data from physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling in BIOLOGXsym™ simulations to reproduce clinically observed liver signals. This integration meant that the response of human liver tissue to biologics can be evaluated in a highly controlled and representative environment. The BIOLOGXsym™ simulation was also used to model concurrent treatments with tocilizumab and acetaminophen, demonstrating that this modeling approach can also be used to test the effect of drug-drug interactions on the liver.

The quest to understand and mitigate biologic-induced liver injury has led to the integration of cutting-edge technologies like metabolomics analysis and liver-on-chip models. Metabolomics analysis has proven invaluable in unraveling the metabolic changes associated with drug-induced liver injury, providing crucial insights into early detection and risk assessment during drug development. Together, these technologies hold the promise of advancing drug development and ensuring the safe and effective use of biologic drugs.

References

  1. Beaudoin JJ, Clemens L, Miedel M, et al. The Combination of a Human Biomimetic Liver Microphysiology System with BIOLOGXsym, a Quantitative Systems Toxicology (QST) Modeling Platform for Macromolecules, Provides Mechanistic Understanding of Tocilizumab- and GGF2-Induced Liver Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(11), 9692. doi:10.3390/ijms24119692
Metabolon
Our team is made up of over 45 PhDs, has been published 4,000+ times, and is committed to hard work, excellence, and success through collaboration. With over 15,000 projects, Metabolon has been a trusted partner of researchers for over 25 years.

Topics

Share this article

GET STARTED

Talk with an expert

Request a quote, get detailed information on sample types, or learn how metabolomics can accelerate your research. Find our contact details are here.

Find us on:

Talk with a Metabolomics expert

References

1. Zgoda-Pols, J.R., et al., Metabolomics analysis reveals elevation of 3-indoxyl sulfate in plasma and brain during chemically-induced acute kidney injury in mice: investigation of nicotinic acid receptor agonists. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2011. 255(1): p. 48-56.

2. Bryant, J.A., et al., The impact of an oral purified microbiome therapeutic on the gastrointestinal microbiome. Nat Med, 2026. 32(1): p. 186-196

3. McGovern, B .H., et al., SER-109, an Investigational Microbiome Drugto Reduce Recurrence After Clostridioides difficile Infection: Lessons Learned From a Phase 2 Trial. Clin Infect Dis, 2021. 72(12): p. 2132-2140.

4. Feuerstadt, P., et al., SER-109, an Oral Microbiome Therapy for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. N Engl J Med, 2022. 386(3): p. 220-229.

5. Hu, Z., et al., Targeted metabolomics reveals novel diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol, 2025. 19(6): p. 1737-1750.

6. Butler, F.M., et al., Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Diet-Related Metabolites Are Associated With Kidney Function in the Adventist Health Study-2 Cohort. J Ren Nutr, 2025.

7. Stanford, J., et al., Metabolomic Profiling and Diet Quality Scoring in a Randomized Crossover Trial of Healthy and Typical Dietary Patterns. Mol Nutr Food Res, 2025 . 69(23): p. e70271.

8. O’Connor, L.E., et al., Metabolomic Profiling of an Ultraprocessed Dietary Pattern in a Domiciled Randomized Controlled Crossover Feeding Trial. J Nutr, 2023. 153(8): p. 2181-2192.

9. Fritsch, D.A., et al., Microbiome function underpins the efficacy of a fiber-supplemented dietary intervention in dogs with chronic large bowel diarrhea. BMC Vet Res, 2022. 18(1): p. 245.

10. Leal, L.N., et al., Preweaning nutrient supply improves lactation productivity and reduces the risk of culling in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci, 2025. 108(6): p. 5875-5888.

11. Ahsin, M., et al., Soil and pasture health underlie improved beef nutrient density determined by untargeted metabolomics in Southern US grass finished beef systems. NPJ Sci Food, 2025. 9(1): p. 151.

12. Yin, W., et al., Plasma lipid profiling across species for the identification of optimal animal models of human dyslipidemia. J Lipid Res, 2012. 53(1): p. 51-65.

13. Porter, F .D., et al., Cholesterol oxidation products are sensitive and specific blood-based biomarkers for Niemann-Pick C1 disease. Sci Transl Med, 2010. 2(56): p. 56ra81.

14. Needham, B .D., et al., Plasma and Fecal Metabolite Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biol Psychiatry, 2021. 89(5): p. 451-462

15. Li, C., et al., Estradiol and mTORC2 cooperate to enhance prostaglandin biosynthesis and tumorigenesis in TSC2-deficient LAM cells. J Exp Med, 2014. 211(1): p. 15-28.

16. Green, P.G., et al., Metabolic flexibility and reverse remodelling of the failing human heart. Eur Heart J, 2025. 46(25): p. 2422-2433.

17. Maekawa, H., et al., SGLT2 inhibition protects kidney function by SAM-dependent epigenetic repression of inflammatory genes under metabolic stress. J Clin Invest, 2025. 135(19).

18. Wu, D., et al., Integrated screens reveal that guanine nucleotide depletion, which is irreversible via targeting IMPDH2, inhibits pancreatic cancer and potentiates KRAS inhibition. Gut, 2026.

19. Schwerdtfeger, L.A., et al., Gut microbiota and metabolites are linked to disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Cell Rep Med, 2025. 6(4): p. 102055.

20. Wu, H., et al., Microbiome-metabolome dynamics associated with impaired glucose control and responses to lifestyle changes. Nat Med, 2025. 31(7): p. 2222-2231.

21. Jacobs, J.P., et al., Cognitive behavioral therapy for irritable bowel syndrome induces bidirectional alterations in the brain-gut-microbiome axis associated with gastrointestinal symptom improvement. Microbiome, 2021. 9(1): p. 236.

22. Pietzner, M., et al., Plasma metabolites to profile pathways in noncommunicable disease multimorbidity. Nat Med, 2021. 27(3): p. 471-479.

23. Faquih, T.O., et al., Robust Metabolomic Age Prediction Based on a Wide Selection of Metabolites. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2025. 80(3).

24. Scherer, N., et al., Coupling metabolomics and exome sequencing reveals graded effects of rare damaging heterozygous variants on gene function and human traits. Nat Genet, 2025. 57(1): p. 193-205.

25. Holmes, Z.C., et al., Untargeted metabolomic analysis of human milk from healthy mothers reveals drivers of metabolite variability. Sci Rep, 2024. 14(1): p. 20827.

26. Titz, B., et al., Implications of Ocular Confounding Factors for Aqueous Humor Proteomic and Metabolomic Analyses in Retinal Diseases. Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2024. 13(6): p. 17.

27. Bloom, S.M., et al., Cysteine dependence of Lactobacillus iners is a potential therapeutic target for vaginal microbiota modulation. Nat Microbiol, 2022. 7(3): p. 434-450.

28. Leimer, E.M., et al., Lipid profile of human synovial fluid following intra-articular ankle fracture. J Orthop Res, 2017. 35(3): p. 657-666.